The financial world is experiencing a dramatic dance of fortunes, largely influenced by the intrigue surrounding the quantitative trading company, DeepSeekAs excitement engulfs the market, there lurks an unsettling truth: many quantitative institutions associated with DeepSeek are grappling with significant withdrawals, leading to a notable contraction in their scalesThe story, however, is multifaceted and involves not just a single company but a web of financial institutions reacting to a shifting market environment.

This phenomena began to unfold as early as last year when firms like the mathematical powerhouse known as Huanfang (a sibling company to DeepSeek) started revealing signs of significant scale reductionsThe momentum didn’t just halt; it gained speed as the dawn of 2025 approachedHigh-profile quantitative hedge funds that once boasted assets exceeding 100 billion yuan have, as of now, receded with majority falling back into the 50-100 billion yuan range.

Prominent institutions feeling the pinch include the Shanghai NianKong Data Technology Center, Shengrui Investment Management, and Ningbo Square and Investment Management, each previously securing high-stakes positions in the formidable quantitative hedge fund rankingsRecorded information verifies that their asset sizes have fallen to alarming lows, between 20 billion and 50 billion yuan by mid-February 2025.

Even larger, well-respected players haven’t been immune to this trendFor instance, Guo’en Capital saw its scale diminish from the 50-100 billion yuan range to below 50 billionAnother firm, Pansong Asset, known for its rapid expansion in 2024 to a threshold of 100 billion yuan, now finds itself struggling to maintain that level as the spring of 2025 approaches.

The situation appears to reflect a broader issue within the Chinese quantitative sectorHistorically, asset reductions faced by these institutions have often correlated with declines in returns

Advertisements

The stark example of the sweeping redemption peak between 2020 and 2021 highlights how top-tier quantitative firms saw their coveted excess returns evaporate almost overnightYet, 2025 is weaving a different taleReports indicate that the recent scale declines amongst institutions do not directly correspond with their performances.

Take Pansong Asset as a case in pointDespite volatility in its metrics, its related index-enhanced products exceeded the benchmark index by 20 percentage points in 2024, showcasing that strong performances are still achievable even amidst setbacks.

The firm attributed its scale changes to three primary factors: First, the end-of-year cash flow needs of certain clients prompting withdrawals for financial planning; second, the complexities surrounding clients’ investment decisions influenced by fluctuating equity markets, short-term performances, and varying asset allocation schemes; and third, the nature of investment strategies that emphasize long-term stock value, leading to inevitable short-term scale volatility.

Moreover, the testing waters of the equity market have significantly encompassed high-net-worth individuals' risk appetitesAccording to the Private Equity Ranking Network, quantitative funds managing over 100 billion yuan averaged a return of 12.81% in 2024, with over 80% of products generating positive returnsIronically, these figures, while seemingly commendable, haven’t staved off a contraction in the overall size of the industryThe average annual growth for the sector still lags behind the rises seen in broader market indices like the CSI 300.

It is notable that the understanding of quantitative strategies has evolvedInvestors are not only more familiar with the workings of quantitative investments but are also grappling with acceptable volatility levels post-investmentAs the marketplace matures, there’s a discernible erosion of mystique surrounding renowned firms, contributing to a selective withdrawal strategy

Advertisements

Advertisements

Advertisements

Advertisements